The opening session brought together four panelists who represent different sectors - Social, Technology, Policy and Education - Archana Shah of Bandhej, Jatin Bhatt of Ambedkar University, Sunil Malhotra of Ideafarms and Abhimanyu Nohwar of BCG to discuss DesignFirst.
The Forum took off with an interactive session, with the four panel members responding to questions raised by moderator Ravi Badve of Mastercard, in which the audience also participated. All stakeholders have different views of design - and therefore each one’s agenda is different. These multiple perspectives make it hard to pigeon-hole design or create a very specific conclusion about how one policy can be framed or to find a common set of concerns. Some of the thoughts were how to put ‘design thinking’ first instead of ‘ourselves’ and how to make a difference through small interventions.
Making design democratic
Sunil Malhotra spoke about the need to make design more democratic, saying, “Design is too important to be left to designers. We cling on to design as we own it. We need to create ways for it to go further.” Malhotra reminded us that it was Steve Jobs who was responsible for creating a greater design consciousness. Could design be a connection? After all, the only reason design exists is to enrich lives and livelihoods.
Archana Shah of Bandhej emphasised the need to support livelihoods for craft, especially with its diverse skills. Supporting the craft sector would mean supporting diversity and the uniqueness of each region. More so, to aid them in getting markets for their products, as their earlier ready markets no longer exist. Shah said there was a need for collaborative efforts from designers, also because Indian crafts are naturally eco-friendly ways of production and therefore sustainable.
How design works
Bharti Ramola, a business consultant gave an outstanding example of design intervention that brought down the accident rate in Mumbai’s transportation line. “....a fantastic real impact of a story, so heartbreaking and so possible.” Accidents for commuters of suburban trains were the primary cause for the maximum number of unnatural deaths. Painting railway sleepers across the tracks yellow helped commuters to gauge distances while crossing and led to a 71% reduction of accidents outside Vadala.
Aditya Dev Sood of Vihara shared his learnings from working in public health for over a decade, adding, “...in all these experiences there is something around the agency model, that we have learned is a logical way to good design.” Sood feels just innovations and interventions are not good enough and for these to be scaled up, designers have to promote them. “You actually have to proselytize, evangelize, sell and market just as Steve Jobs did.”
Peyush Agarwal of Designit spoke about his experiences with the Design Yatra policy. “We were thrilled as designers, and in the capacity of design, invited to do something that would be part of policy.” However, Agarwal points out, in his understanding, while the Government is responsible for carrying out the initiatives, our country is so populous that often the individual gets ignored. Could we, as a community, actually take this opportunity to see how to take micro to macro, looking at what we need as individuals?
Do we need a national policy?
The next round of discussion was about how and what a Design First policy could achieve. Jatin Bhatt responded noting that it was important to get a commitment from everybody - and how would we achieve that? Sunil Malhotra of questioned if we need a policy at all issued at the national level. Taking the Uber case study, he spoke about the effectiveness of the Uber model in rendering good and reliable services, making the driver accountable and the passenger responsible. While the French Government had not been successful in getting the crime rate down in a certain suburb of Paris, with the introduction of Uber, Malhotra says, “Without a single penny from the government, without regulation, the crime rate in one year fell to 18 per cent because Uber showed up.”
Aditya Sood responded saying that design needs to be forethought with empathy for the ecosystem. There should be some synthetic ability to build bridges between different kinds of stakeholders so they create solutions which can be worked together in new ways. “It may not be regulation, but we are asking for a signal”, said Sood.
Finding a framework
Abhimanyu Nohwar of BCG brought up the need to find a bridge to the Government and ways to “enable these platforms that will allow the public to access all the change-makers and enable the changes.”
Kiran Bir Sethi from Design for Change expressed her belief that the preamble of our constitution is the perfect DesignFirst policy towards creating a humane and empathetic society with greater consciousness.
Anthony Lopez posed the questions - How immersive can design be? How can we co-create? How can we merge with all entities, rather than creating silos?
The discussion unfolded with ideas that reiterated the need to open up the ownership of design, and make it far more inclusive. The British Council report that speaks about 60,000 designers - is that quantification important, asked Archana Shah, or to look at design as a way of life? “If it's got to become national policy, it has to be an inclusive part of everything - whether it's presenting the budget, the environment or creating a transportation policy - design has to be an inherent part of it.”
Changing the perception of design
A central concern was to come up with an actionable plan, to set and achieve more specific goals. One of these was to proliferate design thinking. Sudhir Sharma of Value Labs and DesignIndia Magazine noted, “Design thinking is not relevant in India so far, because 70% of our people don't know what design is. That is why India needs DesignFirst. What design thinking did for the west, design thinking needs to do for India.”
Devika Krishnan, of Vayati Weaves who has worked extensively in the crafts sector, said, “As we move from a subsidized economy to a participatory economy, we need to bring design to the children in the little schools in the tiniest of villages and slums. Some sort of simplification of design needs to start at the age of 6 - then it becomes a way of life.”
Looking at design as a verb and not a noun would aid in the understanding of what design can do. There is a tendency to associate design as an aesthetic endeavour, and few platforms talk about the social impact of design, or design as a strategic tool. Abhimanyu Nohwar said, “The challenge is - if we change that perception, if we bring the multidimensionality of design, people will understand what to do with design and half the battle will be won.”
Further reads:
Cover letter: Let’s Make History
On Saturday, the 8th of February, we had our first forum of 2020 on the special theme of DesignFirst in our Gurgaon studio . . . Read more
Finding India, Making India
Mr. Amitabh Kant spoke about the need to go back to our roots and bring out design as a differentiator for India . . . Read more
Twin Peaks
Anthony Lopez of Lopez Design presented the two Forum initiatives - What Design Can Do and Design First Policy . . . Read more
Forum Post Mortem
A critique by 4 Forum participants on the Forum with an eye on how the future of India can be shaped through design, the relevance of Design First, and first steps towards its implementation . . . Read more
2020 Steps Forward
Design means different things to different practitioners. Although we all aim to look at a better quality of life and bring value, accelerate development and foster nation-building, the actual implementation in education, business, crafts or management require us to address diverse agenda . . . Read more
For more information on DesignFirst or to connect, write to us [email protected]